Нови објави

Self Bump

Напишано од Dave, 26.07.2025 at 15:13

Напишано од JT., 16.07.2025 at 00:54

Just curious if your willing to sell now? i know it's not making any money anymore really..

No, I'm not interested in selling, but thank you.

Not even interested in the offer?

It definetly used to do that

Hm whats this phenomenon called when everyone remembers something that isnt there

I thought mousing over the green bar gave your SP and the SP for next rank.

Is mine broken? Or am i wrong?

Unbanned.

Ban tempest and unban ihy

Seguro, todos celebraremos cuando baneen a dominicano

Un poco mas de animo en este foro digo yo no?

Thanks

Oui oui i would also zhange ze RGB to the prope'h bleu
support mon ami

Casca reading this:

I cant help but notice that the "french" flag when choosing "french" as a language on the home screen is wrong. The "french" "president" changed the blue to a darker shade. This is outright ridiculous and needs to be brought to light. Imagine if the English language was displayed with an American flag or if "croatian" was represented at all as a real distinct language.

Say Free Palestine and he will unban

Напишано од AVADAKEDAVRA99, 15.09.2025 at 14:16

Unban my bro ihy you scen ratas

shut up lil bro

I support the ban

Unban my bro ihy you scen ratas

Weisser wolf just continues proving how toxic he is . Calling scen retarded cuz he has no skill at all while being rank 16 . Please ban him

10GRI > opi

Напишано од Weisser Wolf, 15.09.2025 at 10:46

And? those are only battles on the game, what is the point of you posting this, TEMPEST?

who is tempest? my name is kitty

And? those are only battles on the game, what is the point of you posting this, TEMPEST?

This is ihy btw

Mapmaker: [Estus]
Reason for the ban: "Toxicity" against the map isn't a valid reason for banning as i didn't abuse any rules of the scen:





Reason for the appeal: The ban isn't justified, there are literally dailly shit talkings on any WWI game about ballance, counters, bad playing, etc. If he is true to this cause, near all WWI communitry would be banned at this point.

I am writing to request that my ban from the map created by Estus be reviewed and removed. I was banned after stating that the map needs balance and noting that toxic behavior is common there. I believe this ban was arbitrary and inconsistent with the map rules, and I ask that you lift it or require the mapmaker to justify it with evidence.

Why the ban should be lifted

Even if my comment looks "toxic", it is not a personal attack. Banning a player solely for pointing out balance issues (even if its redacted like trash/shit talking or shitposting) is effectively a personal or content-based punishment rather than enforcement of a clear rules violation. According to the published rules, a mapmaker's ban power is limited and regulated. Estus's action conflicts with those limits (see rules cited below).

"If the mapmaker claims a rules violation, the rules require evidence." No evidence has been provided to me or to moderators (to my knowledge), that i have been explicitly abusing glitches or scenario mechanics to personal gain. This was solely a ban motivated by his hating for feedback about balance; and as i said before, near all players who play WWI at one point trashtalks about the scenario itself complaining about unballanced units/factions"

Relevant rule citations and how they apply to my appeal:

Rule 7.1 — "The mapmakers have the privilege to ban a player ...; however, the mapmakers are not allowed to ban a player on a map/scenario for personal reasons or not describing the reasons for the ban."
Estus banned me after I commented on balance. Even if that sounds "toxic", that appears to be a personal or content-based ban (silencing feedback) and was issued without a clear, described reason. This directly conflicts with 7.1.

Rule 7.2 — "Players are assumed innocent ... It is up to the map maker to provide substantial evidence when asked to do. Map makers who fail to do so will have to lift the ban, if the map makers refuses to comply moderators will lift the ban."
No substantial evidence of any rule-breaking on my part has been presented.

Under 7.2, the burden is on Estus to provide proof of me abusing mechanics or something about the scenario itself; failing that, the ban should be lifted or moderators should intervene.

If 1 IF inf has 4 attack, lets say with equal stack bonuses it will roll a random value from 1 to 4, that would be 25% chance to roll 1.

In that video, you can see a battle (0:10 to 0:16) where 10 IF infs rolled 1s on 1 GC inf non stop. Now, because there should be a big stack bonus advantage for the attacker, we can assume the chance to roll 1s in attack is even lower - for simplicity, lets say its around 10%

So the attacker rolled 1s non stop, while the GC inf has 8 HP. That means you have to get an event that has ~10% chance of happening 8 times in row.

That means 0.1 to the power of 8, which means 1 in 100 million. Just so you guys understand how insane it is.

My intentions have always been to create a more fun environment for everyone. Don't take this as a personal attack, but rather a response to the numerous reports I've received regarding this incident. I'm sure your intention wasn't to harm anyone; you weren't even present during the thing. This was simply my response to the disruption caused to that game.

It's unfortunate that the matter has reached this point, and I regret that it remains unresolved. However, extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, so you are no longer banned.

Estus has my support