Spain NC rome rush

Is this the most you can send?

You could actually build tanks instead of only infantries. (watch second half for NC rush)

Напишано од RaulPB, 04.05.2015 at 06:45

You could actually build tanks instead of only infantries. (watch second half for NC rush)

I don't get why you would use tanks with NC, -1 attack normally and -2 attack against PD infantry. The most likely unit a player will encounter playing against france.

Напишано од Sun Tsu, 04.05.2015 at 10:48

I don't get why you would use tanks with NC, -1 attack normally and -2 attack against PD infantry. The most likely unit a player will encounter playing against france.

Usually NC rush though

Напишано од RaulPB, 04.05.2015 at 11:02

Напишано од Sun Tsu, 04.05.2015 at 10:48

I don't get why you would use tanks with NC, -1 attack normally and -2 attack against PD infantry. The most likely unit a player will encounter playing against france.

Usually NC rush though

why use tanks tho?

Напишано од Sun Tsu, 04.05.2015 at 11:59

why use tanks tho?

In case you fear a french rush, why not use your starting economical advantage to make more offensive units?

RA rush, more viable now, 20 tanks, 20 inf, +gen, and still nice income leftover

Напишано од RaulPB, 04.05.2015 at 15:04

Напишано од Sun Tsu, 04.05.2015 at 11:59

why use tanks tho?

In case you fear a french rush, why not use your starting economical advantage to make more offensive units?

Because they will get smashed to bits by pdrush for sure and is a waste

Напишано од Cthulhu, 04.05.2015 at 16:34

RA rush, more viable now, 20 tanks, 20 inf, +gen, and still nice income leftover

in 3vs3 that would mean thier ally won't get money

Напишано од Sun Tsu, 04.05.2015 at 17:43

Because they will get smashed to bits by pdrush for sure and is a waste

Have you tried it yet??

Напишано од RaulPB, 04.05.2015 at 18:16

Напишано од Sun Tsu, 04.05.2015 at 17:43

Because they will get smashed to bits by pdrush for sure and is a waste

Have you tried it yet??

as u wish.

Напишано од Sun Tsu, 04.05.2015 at 18:20

as u wish.

Haha I you too Sun anyway, I just think of buying tanks as a way to assure myself I've bought the most effective units in case I'm rushed. Paying for a NC inf against PD inf won't do any better than a tank.

Напишано од RaulPB, 04.05.2015 at 18:55

Напишано од Sun Tsu, 04.05.2015 at 18:20

as u wish.

Haha I you too Sun anyway, I just think of buying tanks as a way to assure myself I've bought the most effective units in case I'm rushed. Paying for a NC inf against PD inf won't do any better than a tank.

why do full rome as nc for spain anyways since GC PD RA all stronger in full rome

Напишано од Exo-K, 04.05.2015 at 23:21

why do full rome as nc for spain anyways since GC PD RA all stronger in full rome

Cause of the huge movility and the mixed possibility of playing it either deffensive or offensive, depending on how you play NC. It's quite versatile later in the game.

You can rush turn 1 rome and turn 2 attack UK with a 20 inf stack. The increased range for transport ships with NC is really awsome playing with Spain since it's full of ports and surrounded by water. PD and RA are not that versatile, you either use them deffensive or offensively since their main strength is just one of them both. GC is a different story but I still prefer the ship boost to the wierd GC boost/nerf of inf and tanks.

It's all about personal preferences. That doesn't mean NC is the best, it all depends on how you play them.

Напишано од Sun Tsu, 04.05.2015 at 17:43

Напишано од RaulPB, 04.05.2015 at 15:04

Напишано од Sun Tsu, 04.05.2015 at 11:59

why use tanks tho?

In case you fear a french rush, why not use your starting economical advantage to make more offensive units?

Because they will get smashed to bits by pdrush for sure and is a waste

build more tanks...

Напишано од Guest, 06.05.2015 at 05:47

build more tanks...

And then let Soldier001 command them

Did I see that video right that two transports carried 40 units? How is that possible when transports only hold 15?

Напишано од jimmynow, 11.07.2015 at 17:50

Did I see that video right that two transports carried 40 units? How is that possible when transports only hold 15?

because NC gives +5 capacity to naval transports

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

i think GC is the best full rome

Напишано од The Tactician, 11.07.2015 at 19:26

Напишано од jimmynow, 11.07.2015 at 17:50

Did I see that video right that two transports carried 40 units? How is that possible when transports only hold 15?

because NC gives +5 capacity to naval transports

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

i think GC is the best full rome

Ahhh thank you