25.11.2016 - 19:32
I see that when people play in a Coalition war and they lose they go down a rank. This is a problem, if you look at the top coalition board you could see that the top Coalitions have a ton of wins, and they should but if you scroll down to about 11 you could see that there's a pack of Coalitions that don't play at all and if you keep scrolling you could see a pack of Coalitions that have a ton of losses and a few wins. It may not seem like a problem but some have 23 wins and like 29 losses, but there are Coalitions with 0 wins and 1 loss or something similar to that. Am i wrong to thing that people who participate in Coalition wars are being penalized while other Coalitions who play once get ranked higher, I propose that it should be purely be placed biased on the number of wins that the Coalition has collected.
Вчитување...
Вчитување...
|
|
Вчитување...
Вчитување...
|
|
26.11.2016 - 04:38
Good suggestion. And ignore Commando Eagle, he's just an angry little man from Albania who has no where else to express his anger but this game.
----
Вчитување...
Вчитување...
|
|
26.11.2016 - 05:23
----
Вчитување...
Вчитување...
|
|
26.11.2016 - 18:59
Nice job calling chicago a shitty village. Good thing you showed your true face after days of begging me to join best clan in aw D
----
Вчитување...
Вчитување...
|
|
Вчитување...
Вчитување...
|
|
29.11.2016 - 22:25
(getting back on topic..) i support this idea, that it needs to change somehow. but alas, admins aren't quite here, so nothing will be changed. I remember sun tzu had a cool idea, if i can find his forum post ill copy it here
----
Вчитување...
Вчитување...
|
|
22.01.2017 - 23:53
Current rankings still better than old ones (which took long enough to be changed) so let's just be happy that it's not about last 20 games record anymore
---- Moldova is Romania
Вчитување...
Вчитување...
|
Дали сте сигурни?