What's the n1 superpower in this 2017?

USA:
Population: 320 million
GDP: 18.6 trillion
GDP per capita: 57000$
Capital: Washington D.C
Richest and biggest city: New York
Economic growth: 1.6%







China
Population: 1.380 billion
GDP: Depends:
Nominal: 11.4 trillion$
PPP: 21.3 trillion $
Gdp per capita: 8000$/16000$
Capital: Beijing
Richest and biggest city: Shanghai
Economic growth: 6.7%

China not even second

Напишано од Ben Pimpin, 03.02.2017 at 11:31

China not even second

Russia neither then

United States military budget is so large if it was a Countries gdp it would be 23rd in the world.

Напишано од Helly, 03.02.2017 at 11:36

United States military budget is so large if it was a Countries gdp it would be 23rd in the world.

Indeed, but most of it is spend on salaries, not purchasing weapons or funding dev/research projects. That's the problem.

Drone pilot gets $10,000 a month, no college no school needed as a background, there's the flaw.

Напишано од Helly, 03.02.2017 at 11:36

United States military budget is so large if it was a Countries gdp it would be 23rd in the world.

Kek it's larger than the next 9 combined, they operate about 19 aircraft carriers, with it actually being a Congress Act that the Navy cannot operate less than 11 Supercarriers. Meanwhile the rest of the world combined has 9-11 aircraft carriers. And now Trump wants a 300-350 ship navy, although it will create a hell of a lot of jobs like during the Cold War since Reagan wanted a 600 ship navy.

World changed so much in the last 10 years old geopolitical rules doesn't apply anymore. That's why i say Russia is the number one superpower. It leads in cyberwarfare, espionage, it spread influence throughout the world, it leads in media coverage, it gets all the best business deals. Despite having military like South Korea and economy like Italy, it is playing geopolitics way better than America.

China is still not even trying, but their sheer size will simply win eventually, in the future, by having more people, money and larger economy than Russia and America combined. They will be able to pay everything and anyone and they'll simply win.

Напишано од Helly, 03.02.2017 at 11:36

United States military budget is so large if it was a Countries gdp it would be 23rd in the world.

But if we speak in economic rates?
For example: Russia has a high military spending but the country's economy is as same as Spain or California.

Напишано од Skanderbeg, 03.02.2017 at 11:48

World changed so much in the last 10 years old geopolitical rules doesn't apply anymore. That's why i say Russia is the number one superpower. It leads in cyberwarfare, espionage, it spread influence throughout the world, it leads in media coverage, it gets all the best business deals. Despite having military like South Korea and economy like Italy, it is playing geopolitics way better than America.

China is still not even trying, but their sheer size will simply win eventually, in the future, by having more people, money and larger economy than Russia and America combined. They will be able to pay everything and anyone and they'll simply win.

Russia has 10 million alcoholics, outside Moscow, Oil Regions and Saint Petersburg the salaries are as high as India, plus op crisis and oil prices are low.
Best business deals please...
Moscow sold gas with half price discount to China ( which for Moscow means no benefit).
While China and USA has incredible economy advancing at fast rate, Russia is still stacked in 90s.

I'v been at Beijing this year, that is nation based on bullshit and it won't get anywhere

Chinese Military isnt better than russian but overall maybe China is #2

Напишано од Free_Warrior, 03.02.2017 at 11:52

Russia has 10 million alcoholics, outside Moscow, Oil Regions and Saint Petersburg the salaries are as high as India, plus op crisis and oil prices are low.
Best business deals please...
Moscow sold gas with half price discount to China ( which for Moscow means no benefit).
While China and USA has incredible economy advancing at fast rate, Russia is still stacked in 90s.

You asked what is number one SUPERPOWER, not best economy. So make your mind. Do you want results in geopolitics, or results in the economy? MAKE UP YOUR MIND.

Russia is achieving GEOPOLITICAL victories, not economic, best business deals relate to gas, oil, technology and market shares in TOTAL, not domestic market.

Напишано од Skanderbeg, 03.02.2017 at 11:59

Напишано од Free_Warrior, 03.02.2017 at 11:52

Russia has 10 million alcoholics, outside Moscow, Oil Regions and Saint Petersburg the salaries are as high as India, plus op crisis and oil prices are low.
Best business deals please...
Moscow sold gas with half price discount to China ( which for Moscow means no benefit).
While China and USA has incredible economy advancing at fast rate, Russia is still stacked in 90s.

You asked what is number one SUPERPOWER, not best economy. So make your mind. Do you want results in geopolitics, or results in the economy? MAKE UP YOUR MIND.

Russia is achieving GEOPOLITICAL victories, not economic, best business deals relate to gas, oil, technology and market shares in TOTAL, not domestic market.

Geopolitical victories by killing civilians in Aleppo, destroying neighbours and changing USA elections results oh please....
Superpower: economy, Military+ Quality of Life+ Spy intelligence.
What allies has Russia? Iran , destroyed Syria , Belarus, Kazakhstan?????????
USA allies: European Union, North America, Saudi Arabia, Australia, Nigeria, Egypt, Israel,Japan, etc....
Chinese allies:Most of Africa, Vietnam, Thailand, North Korea, Pakistan,Brazil, etc...

Напишано од Free_Warrior, 03.02.2017 at 12:05

Geopolitical victories by killing civilians in Aleppo, destroying neighbours and changing USA elections results oh please....
Superpower: economy, Military+ Quality of Life+ Spy intelligence.
What allies has Russia? Iran , destroyed Syria , Belarus, Kazakhstan?????????
USA allies: European Union, North America, Saudi Arabia, Australia, Nigeria, Egypt, Israel,Japan, etc....
Chinese allies:Most of Africa, Vietnam, Thailand, North Korea, Pakistan,Brazil, etc...

Sigh.... you first ask about geopolitics, then you complain about it and use morals & ethics. Or do you believe only moral country can be strong and superpower? Because then America is not after dropping nuke on Japan and agent orange on Vietnam. So you are either using double-standards or doublethink.

America obviously is not pulling victories out of their missions, they lost $5tn in Iraq and Afghanistan, oil price dropping, EU is turning against them, China is getting stronger. While in the other side, Russia achieved all victories it planned, Crimea, UK referendum, Trump in US, alliance with China and Iran, Syria saved and all that with minimum effort and funding.

--------

$5tn would be justified only if America managed to defeat Russia and China, hence spending so much because it would worth it. Leaving America as the sole superpower and the strongest country on earth, but this way, they spent it on small countries like middle east which never had and never will have power to fight America.

Напишано од Skanderbeg, 03.02.2017 at 12:15

Напишано од Free_Warrior, 03.02.2017 at 12:05

Geopolitical victories by killing civilians in Aleppo, destroying neighbours and changing USA elections results oh please....
Superpower: economy, Military+ Quality of Life+ Spy intelligence.
What allies has Russia? Iran , destroyed Syria , Belarus, Kazakhstan?????????
USA allies: European Union, North America, Saudi Arabia, Australia, Nigeria, Egypt, Israel,Japan, etc....
Chinese allies:Most of Africa, Vietnam, Thailand, North Korea, Pakistan,Brazil, etc...

Sigh.... you first ask about geopolitics, then you complain about it and use morals & ethics. Or do you believe only moral country can be strong and superpower? Because then America is not after dropping nuke on Japan and agent orange on Vietnam. So you are either using double-standards or doublethink.

America obviously is not pulling victories out of their missions, they lost $5tn in Iraq and Afghanistan, oil price dropping, EU is turning against them, China is getting stronger. While in the other side, Russia achieved all victories it planned, Crimea, UK referendum, Trump in US, alliance with China and Iran, Syria saved and all that with minimum effort and funding.

--------

$5tn would be justified only if America managed to defeat Russia and China, hence spending so much because it would worth it. Leaving America as the sole superpower and the strongest country on earth, but this way, they spent it on small countries like middle east which never had and never will have power to fight America.

Nuking Japan is thought to have saved more lives than it cost. Afghanistan and Iraqi wars are as won as they can possibly be. EU slightly pulled awayin the past few years but now the US is the one pulling away. Russia is the 2nd world power and it is not even close to US Military Power. China is a rising power and if rise continues than it will surpass russia and than USA. The Budget spent on the Middle east is to be expected in 16 years of war when the US spends over 500 billion every year

Напишано од Ben Pimpin, 03.02.2017 at 12:37

Nuking Japan is thought to have saved more lives than it cost.

He said it was immoral to bomb Syria so i used Japan example.

Напишано од Ben Pimpin, 03.02.2017 at 12:37

Afghanistan and Iraqi wars are as won as they can possibly be.

Well, if creation of ISIS and Taliban is victory, then yes, wars are won, but i believe US went there to stop those terrorists, not make them stronger. So wars are lost.

Напишано од Ben Pimpin, 03.02.2017 at 12:37

Russia is the 2nd world power and it is not even close to US Military Power.

You again mix two things; military power and world power, as world power suits more into political role which is the most important.

Russia have smaller army and spending than America, but yet more political victories than America, and that counts, that's why nations use military in the first place - to achieve political victory, and yet Russia is achieving without military.

But even that is arguable, as US military power is only based on highly-specialized standing army and no reserves, while Russian Army is conscript standing army and large reserves of 20 million people. Russian standing army is there to train recruits how to fight and to protect the country UNTIL reserves are mobilized and sent to the front to fight the war - reserves are ex-conscripts who had 1-2 years of training and they are eligible for war until they reach 50, after that they are territorial units or as you call it 'militia', localized armed units to protect order, protect civilians and help out the army if it passes through the region.

America doesn't have those, to if war last few years and alot of people are lost in it, America will suffer from troop shortages as it doesn't have reserves.

Напишано од Skanderbeg, 03.02.2017 at 12:51

Напишано од Ben Pimpin, 03.02.2017 at 12:37

Nuking Japan is thought to have saved more lives than it cost.

He said it was immoral to bomb Syria so i used Japan example.

Напишано од Ben Pimpin, 03.02.2017 at 12:37

Afghanistan and Iraqi wars are as won as they can possibly be.

Well, if creation of ISIS and Taliban is victory, then yes, wars are won, but i believe US went there to stop those terrorists, not make them stronger. So wars are lost.

Напишано од Ben Pimpin, 03.02.2017 at 12:37

Russia is the 2nd world power and it is not even close to US Military Power.

You again mix two things; military power and world power, as world power suits more into political role which is the most important.

Russia have smaller army and spending than America, but yet more political victories than America, and that counts, that's why nations use military in the first place - to achieve political victory, and yet Russia is achieving without military.

But even that is arguable, as US military power is only based on highly-specialized standing army and no reserves, while Russian Army is conscript standing army and large reserves of 20 million people. Russian standing army is there to train recruits how to fight and to protect the country UNTIL reserves are mobilized and sent to the front to fight the war - reserves are ex-conscripts who had 1-2 years of training and they are eligible for war until they reach 50, after that they are territorial units or as you call it 'militia', localized armed units to protect order, protect civilians and help out the army if it passes through the region.

America doesn't have those, to if war last few years and alot of people are lost in it, America will suffer from troop shortages as it doesn't have reserves.

i read the conversation i just pointed something out. US does have reserves just not as large. The Taliban was already there and in charge. and Leaving Iraq created ISIS tho destroying the country contributes. more political victory but russia has Nearly lost every battle for European loyalties since the fall of the soviet Union and now with this agressive china US allies in Asia are spreading too. But i will give u that russian army is more cost efficient than almost any other in the world. Question was most powerful country economy and Military strength have alot to do with Power.

Also Iraqi war wasnt about terror. it was about oil

Ha, america doing all this building when they are in how much debt?

Напишано од Skanderbeg, 03.02.2017 at 12:15

Напишано од Free_Warrior, 03.02.2017 at 12:05

Geopolitical victories by killing civilians in Aleppo, destroying neighbours and changing USA elections results oh please....
Superpower: economy, Military+ Quality of Life+ Spy intelligence.
What allies has Russia? Iran , destroyed Syria , Belarus, Kazakhstan?????????
USA allies: European Union, North America, Saudi Arabia, Australia, Nigeria, Egypt, Israel,Japan, etc....
Chinese allies:Most of Africa, Vietnam, Thailand, North Korea, Pakistan,Brazil, etc...

Sigh.... you first ask about geopolitics, then you complain about it and use morals & ethics. Or do you believe only moral country can be strong and superpower? Because then America is not after dropping nuke on Japan and agent orange on Vietnam. So you are either using double-standards or doublethink.

America obviously is not pulling victories out of their missions, they lost $5tn in Iraq and Afghanistan, oil price dropping, EU is turning against them, China is getting stronger. While in the other side, Russia achieved all victories it planned, Crimea, UK referendum, Trump in US, alliance with China and Iran, Syria saved and all that with minimum effort and funding.

--------

$5tn would be justified only if America managed to defeat Russia and China, hence spending so much because it would worth it. Leaving America as the sole superpower and the strongest country on earth, but this way, they spent it on small countries like middle east which never had and never will have power to fight America.

So then Russia is the best country in the world?
Facts says the opposite
Russia has a big deficit a recession and a poor country like Russia cant be considered as superpower.The only middle classes are located in Moscow and Saint Petersburg while China has already nearly 300-500 million of people considered as middle classes and USA has a great middle class. Middle classes are the most important part of a society and without it any country could considered as a developed country. If you aren't a developed country you cant be even considered as superpower or regional power.
Russia survives thanks to oil, gas and diamonds but this resources are not infinite.
Add to this 10 millions of alcoholics without good jobs which need help, 20 million+ pensioners and an enormous income disequality.
While 100 billionaires are rich thanks to a corrupt monopoly made by Putin the rest of the country is starving to death.
If you cant give food to your soldiers, how they will fight?
The biggest army supply to Russia were Ukrainian army manufacture factories. Now part of their tanks and planes are unusable.
So how a normal person can consider this desperate state a superpower enough to fight China with 13 times more population or USA the richest country in the world?
Most of the nuclear warheads are old as fuck and conserved in unknown conditions.
The only thing does Russia is send planes and soldiers to inestable and poorer countries to try to restore part of its former glory.
China and USA are the new superpowers , Russia is just a regional power nothing more nothing less.

Напишано од Skanderbeg, 03.02.2017 at 11:48

i say Russia is the number one superpower.

wow who would have seen that coming

USA and it's not even close

China is still playing catch up

Russia isn't even a superpower anymore so I don't know how it could be considered #1, it's clearly a regional power

I still say russia is # 2 but agree that its not evn close

Напишано од Helly, 03.02.2017 at 11:36

United States military budget is so large if it was a Countries gdp it would be 23rd in the world.

How come the US Military is pretty outdated then ?

Напишано од Guest, 03.02.2017 at 18:47

Напишано од Helly, 03.02.2017 at 11:36

United States military budget is so large if it was a Countries gdp it would be 23rd in the world.

How come the US Military is pretty outdated then ?

Because you don't fix what isn't broken. I'm sure if they ever feel threatened they will invest in innovation.

Напишано од Helly, 03.02.2017 at 18:51

Напишано од Guest, 03.02.2017 at 18:47

Напишано од Helly, 03.02.2017 at 11:36

United States military budget is so large if it was a Countries gdp it would be 23rd in the world.

How come the US Military is pretty outdated then ?

Because you don't fix what isn't broken. I'm sure if they ever feel threatened they will invest in innovation.

Abrams are extremely outdated, I've not done much research recently but I doubt they have any projects in the work to update their main battle tank?

Напишано од Free_Warrior, 03.02.2017 at 14:18

So then Russia is the best country in the world?
Facts says the opposite
Russia has a big deficit a recession and a poor country like Russia cant be considered as superpower.The only middle classes are located in Moscow and Saint Petersburg while China has already nearly 300-500 million of people considered as middle classes and USA has a great middle class. Middle classes are the most important part of a society and without it any country could considered as a developed country. If you aren't a developed country you cant be even considered as superpower or regional power.
Russia survives thanks to oil, gas and diamonds but this resources are not infinite.
Add to this 10 millions of alcoholics without good jobs which need help, 20 million+ pensioners and an enormous income disequality.
While 100 billionaires are rich thanks to a corrupt monopoly made by Putin the rest of the country is starving to death.
If you cant give food to your soldiers, how they will fight?
The biggest army supply to Russia were Ukrainian army manufacture factories. Now part of their tanks and planes are unusable.
So how a normal person can consider this desperate state a superpower enough to fight China with 13 times more population or USA the richest country in the world?
Most of the nuclear warheads are old as fuck and conserved in unknown conditions.
The only thing does Russia is send planes and soldiers to inestable and poorer countries to try to restore part of its former glory.
China and USA are the new superpowers , Russia is just a regional power nothing more nothing less.

No one said its the best (it is for me personally), but number one superpower.

You see superpower as some orderly sunny nation with happy healthy citizens, i see superpower as someone who gets the job done.

Anyone who says China has no idea what they are talking about. The US is one level above superpower. It has no equal.

Напишано од Guest, 03.02.2017 at 18:57

Напишано од Helly, 03.02.2017 at 18:51

Напишано од Guest, 03.02.2017 at 18:47

Напишано од Helly, 03.02.2017 at 11:36

United States military budget is so large if it was a Countries gdp it would be 23rd in the world.

How come the US Military is pretty outdated then ?

Because you don't fix what isn't broken. I'm sure if they ever feel threatened they will invest in innovation.

Abrams are extremely outdated, I've not done much research recently but I doubt they have any projects in the work to update their main battle tank?

the m1 abrams to date is one of the best tanks in the world, it is indeed an old design but they have been modifying it heavily since 2008.

Напишано од Helly, 03.02.2017 at 20:18

Напишано од Guest, 03.02.2017 at 18:57

Напишано од Helly, 03.02.2017 at 18:51

Напишано од Guest, 03.02.2017 at 18:47

Напишано од Helly, 03.02.2017 at 11:36

United States military budget is so large if it was a Countries gdp it would be 23rd in the world.

How come the US Military is pretty outdated then ?

Because you don't fix what isn't broken. I'm sure if they ever feel threatened they will invest in innovation.

Abrams are extremely outdated, I've not done much research recently but I doubt they have any projects in the work to update their main battle tank?

the m1 abrams to date is one of the best tanks in the world, it is indeed an old design but they have been modifying it heavily since 2008.

It's not worth the money you're paying for, It's cannon cant even pierce russian tanks.