2v2 Coalition War

THERE IS NO REASON NOT TO HAVE IT, MAKE IT POSSIBLE.

There is no reason to be a non coalition that can't even gather 3 people for CW.

You must be talking about int, Fruit is proposing it so we can get even more wars, and to prove the fact we have at least 3 people online here:


CW points
1153

won/lost
5 : 2 Latest games
vs Nation Of ELITE +52 16h ago
vs Nation Of ELITE +58 19h ago
vs Nation Of ELITE -47 19h ago
vs Nation Of ELITE +59 20h ago
vs The Assassins -60 22h ago
vs Czechoslovak Legion +41 1d ago
vs Islamic Republic +50 2d ago


We only have 1 less coalition war than int in 2 days...

>5 games in row.
Oh wow. Congratulations. Enjoy your absence of life.

>call us inactive
>call us lifeless
You're out of arguements supporting that failure of coalition you're in.

Who cares? You were inactive when I saw your coalition's page last time. I don't have to observe your activity everyday and know that you suddenly played 5 games one after another.

All three of us are on right now as we speak, ska. Your argument is irrelevant and your inferiority complex to kanker bigger than ever. We will probably play some CWs today too, and probably tomorrow as well because we are more active than /int/. this is why you guys are so butthurt about us leaving, you lost 75% of your activity in a few days; and it will never return. Just like how vasilisk will never return, funny huh?

P.S we all know nobody on /int/ has a life


NOW GET OUT OF MY THREAD

Напишано од Ska-boo, 15.06.2011 at 09:42

Who cares? You were inactive when I saw your coalition's page last time. I don't have to observe your activity everyday and know that you suddenly played 5 games one after another.

not understanding -- im pretty sure i'm the most inactive of the actives and i'm on like 6 hrs a day

WTF IS THIS SHIT

Ska plays in the ungodly siberian hours and he's pretty much alone on afterwind at that time

Ok. And what do you guys think about 2v2 coalition wars anyway?

Personally, I think it's fine the way it is.

A coalition is a pact or treaty among individuals or groups, during which they cooperate in joint action, each in their own self-interest, joining forces together for a common cause. This alliance may be temporary or a matter of convenience. A coalition thus differs from a more formal covenant. Possibly described as a joining of 'factions', usually those with overlapping interests rather than opposing

IT CAN BE 2 IN THE REAL SENSE OF THE WORD; SHOULD BE THE SAME HERE

also, from wikipedyuh

Stop arguing children, uncle sam doesn't appreciate the harsh words being tossed here, instead of fighting go sign up for the army and show Amurrica you care!

I would like 2vs2 coalition wars, already thought about it myself.
Or even better: Team-Fights like 2vs2, 3vs3. But independent of coalition.
Means that also 2 players of different coalitions can make a team, where they fight against other teams. Ofc with rankings where you can see which team is most succesfull.
It should also only be allowed to be in 1 team in each category. Only one 2vs2 team, one 3vs3 team and so on.

Agreed 2v2 cw's would be nice