Have Mods Ever done Anything Useful?

Seriously tho? have they?

Yeap, you want specifics or?

This 1 time... i muted waffel. I did a good deed that day.

Напишано од Ben Pimpin, 19.01.2018 at 16:18

Seriously tho? have they?

Banning/muting me multiple times.I guess it was useful for some idk.

Ok muting waffel does seem like good deed ill give u that one

Напишано од Guest, 19.01.2018 at 16:20

Yeap, you want specifics or?

yea and has to be current mod

Напишано од Ben Pimpin, 19.01.2018 at 16:23

Напишано од Guest, 19.01.2018 at 16:20

Yeap, you want specifics or?

yea and has to be current mod

Lemonade muted me for saying gay shit in global xD

Напишано од Guest, 19.01.2018 at 16:32

Напишано од Ben Pimpin, 19.01.2018 at 16:23

Напишано од Guest, 19.01.2018 at 16:20

Yeap, you want specifics or?

yea and has to be current mod

Lemonade muted me for saying gay shit in global xD

NO WAY ME TOOOO

Напишано од Ben Pimpin, 19.01.2018 at 16:32

NO WAY ME TOOOO

I love lemonade tho, he's my real favorite <3

Towards the game? Not anything particularly except for the occasional help chat spammer. Only exist for the sake of existing in their pretentious state.

Напишано од Universali, 20.01.2018 at 14:13

Towards the game? Not anything particularly except for the occasional help chat spammer. Only exist for the sake of existing in their pretentious state.

yes we are like hw in that sense. We exist in a pretentious state, are useless and probably should be deleted.

Напишано од Permamuted, 20.01.2018 at 15:07

Напишано од Universali, 20.01.2018 at 14:13

Towards the game? Not anything particularly except for the occasional help chat spammer. Only exist for the sake of existing in their pretentious state.

yes we are like hw in that sense. We exist in a pretentious state, are useless and probably should be deleted.

HW would be op if people stoped crying about nefing strats and actually asked something that whole community agrees to.

Напишано од JUGERS2, 20.01.2018 at 15:09

HW would be op if people stoped crying about nefing strats and actually asked something that whole community agrees to.

Haha, the whole community? Such foolish idealism. Also nice responding to my joke comment with more of your conservative populist whining.

Напишано од Permamuted, 20.01.2018 at 15:18

Напишано од JUGERS2, 20.01.2018 at 15:09

HW would be op if people stoped crying about nefing strats and actually asked something that whole community agrees to.

Haha, the whole community? Such foolish idealism. Also nice responding to my joke comment with more of your conservative populist whining.

Not whinning just talking for those that like things as they are....if they didnt they wouldn't play this game.Many playing IF or MOS as it is but i have 1 year to see someone playing HW.

Напишано од JUGERS2, 20.01.2018 at 16:56

Напишано од Permamuted, 20.01.2018 at 15:18

Напишано од JUGERS2, 20.01.2018 at 15:09

HW would be op if people stoped crying about nefing strats and actually asked something that whole community agrees to.

Haha, the whole community? Such foolish idealism. Also nice responding to my joke comment with more of your conservative populist whining.

Not whinning just talking for those that like things as they are....if they didnt they wouldn't play this game.Many playing IF or MOS as it is but i have 1 year to see someone playing HW.

HW is very useful in some situations i'd personally play HW pakistan against a nk or HW spain
mos is just none with stealth and -10 cost + 1 range +2 critical to marines and buffer for submarines power and mobility(even better then NC) + stronk and very sonic air support also its useful in ww1 as russia but in europe+ cws they are not just as good as other choices

Напишано од SyrianDevil, 20.01.2018 at 17:38

Напишано од JUGERS2, 20.01.2018 at 16:56

Напишано од Permamuted, 20.01.2018 at 15:18

Напишано од JUGERS2, 20.01.2018 at 15:09

HW would be op if people stoped crying about nefing strats and actually asked something that whole community agrees to.

Haha, the whole community? Such foolish idealism. Also nice responding to my joke comment with more of your conservative populist whining.

Not whinning just talking for those that like things as they are....if they didnt they wouldn't play this game.Many playing IF or MOS as it is but i have 1 year to see someone playing HW.

HW is very useful in some situations i'd personally play HW pakistan against a nk or HW spain
mos is just none with stealth and -10 cost + 1 range +2 critical to marines and buffer for submarines power and mobility(even better then NC) + stronk and very sonic air support also its useful in ww1 as russia but in europe+ cws they are not just as good as other choices

Lets be real.I have seen many ukr going mos instead of sm but i have never seen HW in 3v3/cw.I have to see it from 2014 era where there was no rush meta.

Напишано од JUGERS2, 20.01.2018 at 18:59

Напишано од SyrianDevil, 20.01.2018 at 17:38

Напишано од JUGERS2, 20.01.2018 at 16:56

Напишано од Permamuted, 20.01.2018 at 15:18

Напишано од JUGERS2, 20.01.2018 at 15:09

HW would be op if people stoped crying about nefing strats and actually asked something that whole community agrees to.

Haha, the whole community? Such foolish idealism. Also nice responding to my joke comment with more of your conservative populist whining.

Not whinning just talking for those that like things as they are....if they didnt they wouldn't play this game.Many playing IF or MOS as it is but i have 1 year to see someone playing HW.

HW is very useful in some situations i'd personally play HW pakistan against a nk or HW spain
mos is just none with stealth and -10 cost + 1 range +2 critical to marines and buffer for submarines power and mobility(even better then NC) + stronk and very sonic air support also its useful in ww1 as russia but in europe+ cws they are not just as good as other choices

Lets be real.I have seen many ukr going mos instead of sm but i have never seen HW in 3v3/cw.I have to see it from 2014 era where there was no rush meta.

call for don immediately...

A quick look at don profile says that 1 of his 3 fav strats its MOS.Now i give you challenge: find 1 competitive active player that his fav strat is HW.No one has it.So why the fuq some people cry about others strats and about HW.Idk maybe when they lose vs ds poland they think ds is overpowerd because they think that SM ukr is weak and out of meta.Anyone syrian lets stop here i got some respect to you dont wanna continue.

How did this troll thread turn into a flame war about strats, lol

Напишано од JUGERS2, 20.01.2018 at 19:10

A quick look at don profile says that 1 of his 3 fav strats its MOS.Now i give you challenge: find 1 competitive active player that his fav strat is HW.No one has it.So why the fuq some people cry about others strats and about HW.Idk maybe when they lose vs ds poland they think ds is overpowerd because they think that SM ukr is weak and out of meta.Anyone syrian lets stop here i got some respect to you dont wanna continue.

Here boi:

Also, those fav strats are broken anyways, it says one of mine favs is blitz and i haven't played blitz for like a year...

Напишано од Al Fappino, 20.01.2018 at 19:31

How did this troll thread turn into a flame war about strats, lol

AtWar

It isnt broken at all.It counts the percentage of your total games u played with this strat.I Universali maybe was playing it old times as i saeid.

Напишано од JUGERS2, 21.01.2018 at 03:07

It isnt broken at all.It counts the percentage of your total games u played with this strat.I Universali maybe was playing it old times as i saeid.

Uni is known for playing HW dude, stop making excuses.

Напишано од JUGERS2, 20.01.2018 at 19:10

A quick look at don profile says that 1 of his 3 fav strats its MOS.Now i give you challenge: find 1 competitive active player that his fav strat is HW.No one has it.So why the fuq some people cry about others strats and about HW.Idk maybe when they lose vs ds poland they think ds is overpowerd because they think that SM ukr is weak and out of meta.Anyone syrian lets stop here i got some respect to you dont wanna continue.

hybrid in the end
me using hw in cw when klevis hacked
even prior to its boost i used it

Напишано од SyrianDevil, 21.01.2018 at 08:12

Напишано од JUGERS2, 20.01.2018 at 19:10

A quick look at don profile says that 1 of his 3 fav strats its MOS.Now i give you challenge: find 1 competitive active player that his fav strat is HW.No one has it.So why the fuq some people cry about others strats and about HW.Idk maybe when they lose vs ds poland they think ds is overpowerd because they think that SM ukr is weak and out of meta.Anyone syrian lets stop here i got some respect to you dont wanna continue.

hybrid in the end
me using hw in cw when klevis hacked
even prior to its boost i used it

You used it for the lolz....also many dont even know there is hybrid warfare as strat.Its normal for low ranks to pick RA.You are getting to my point that HW need buff but some care with other strats that are ok.

Напишано од JUGERS2, 21.01.2018 at 11:03

E
x
c
u
s
e
s

Напишано од JUGERS2, 21.01.2018 at 11:03

Напишано од SyrianDevil, 21.01.2018 at 08:12

Напишано од JUGERS2, 20.01.2018 at 19:10

A quick look at don profile says that 1 of his 3 fav strats its MOS.Now i give you challenge: find 1 competitive active player that his fav strat is HW.No one has it.So why the fuq some people cry about others strats and about HW.Idk maybe when they lose vs ds poland they think ds is overpowerd because they think that SM ukr is weak and out of meta.Anyone syrian lets stop here i got some respect to you dont wanna continue.

hybrid in the end
me using hw in cw when klevis hacked
even prior to its boost i used it

You used it for the lolz....also many dont even know there is hybrid warfare as strat.Its normal for low ranks to pick RA.You are getting to my point that HW need buff but some care with other strats that are ok.

HW tank is stronger then ra tank with +1att/cost
HW inf is a pd inf without bonus vs tanks and without range nerf also -10 cost
HW militia are gw militia that are designed for expanding to replace the infantry roll and give then the freedom to do another tasks
marines are simply an addition that gives the strategy more options and makes it ideal for world games they are like secondary attack units with their 70 cost
LB wont be better then that all the time.. there's militia boost addition

Напишано од JUGERS2, 21.01.2018 at 11:03

You used it for the lolz....also many dont even know there is hybrid warfare as strat.Its normal for low ranks to pick RA.You are getting to my point that HW need buff but some care with other strats that are ok.

hw tries to be both gw and gc. As a result boosting the tanks marines or the inf until hw is considered "good" would render either gc or gw redundant. The strat needs to be reinvented entirely. The only reason hw has been boosted to its current form is because there are players who like using it. This was discussed in the past but you obviously didnt read the previous dicussions. Now can you stop spamming other threads and post your strategy change concerns here.

https://atwar-game.com/forum/topic.php?topic_id=36144

Напишано од Permamuted, 21.01.2018 at 11:23

Напишано од JUGERS2, 21.01.2018 at 11:03

You used it for the lolz....also many dont even know there is hybrid warfare as strat.Its normal for low ranks to pick RA.You are getting to my point that HW need buff but some care with other strats that are ok.

hw tries to be both gw and gc. As a result boosting the tanks marines or the inf until hw is considered "good" would render either gc or gw redundant. The strat needs to be reinvented entirely. The only reason hw has been boosted to its current form is because there are players who like using it. This was discussed in the past but you obviously didnt read the previous dicussions. Now can you stop spamming other threads and post your strategy change concerns here.

https://atwar-game.com/forum/topic.php?topic_id=36144

I posted it.Nerf gw like make marines +10 cost .Thats all.Maybe consider slight buff in HW to give it more flavor.