Нови објави

Напишано од Professor Adog, Денес at 15:04

Напишано од Asylan, 14.10.2024 at 15:25

Напишано од Le Pourfendeur, 13.10.2024 at 00:59

Okay thank you my friend, the name of the map is : " Le Pourfendeur's map 3"

Normaly the fighters are not locked behind upgrades i think

tell me if you see anything special with this map,

thank you

Hi. I was able to create a game and make air transport and fighters. I see some no-go zones on your map in Turkey. Try uploading a screenshot on Imgur.com and sending the link here.

Omg you guys still play the game

Yes

Напишано од Your Laki, Денес at 04:46

I wonder how many long inactive players have actually died

rip mauzer cirrhosis of the liver

Casual Saturday #12 - Third Age of Middle-Earth by Gilalad
2 ally.
https://atwar-game.com/games/?link=3288370155

Напишано од Asylan, 14.10.2024 at 15:25

Напишано од Le Pourfendeur, 13.10.2024 at 00:59

Okay thank you my friend, the name of the map is : " Le Pourfendeur's map 3"

Normaly the fighters are not locked behind upgrades i think

tell me if you see anything special with this map,

thank you

Hi. I was able to create a game and make air transport and fighters. I see some no-go zones on your map in Turkey. Try uploading a screenshot on Imgur.com and sending the link here.

Omg you guys still play the game

Напишано од Oleg, Денес at 12:41

Напишано од PalmaDeMallorca, Денес at 10:05

I need a 269 to 269 just for all the drama that would happen.

No drama really, GOP right now has control of 26 the House delegations and Democrats control 22 delegations. Two states - Minnesota and North Carolina - have split delegations. There is no real possibility of Democrats gaining control of majority of the House delegations.

If i'm not mistaken the senate is controlled by democrats though (I might be wrong, don't really remember) Meaning a VP and a President from different parties

Напишано од PalmaDeMallorca, Денес at 10:05

I need a 269 to 269 just for all the drama that would happen.

No drama really, GOP right now has control of 26 the House delegations and Democrats control 22 delegations. Two states - Minnesota and North Carolina - have split delegations. There is no real possibility of Democrats gaining control of majority of the House delegations.

I need a 269 to 269 just for all the drama that would happen.

With just 11 days remaining until the elections, it's interesting to track the votes that parties have already secured through In-Person Early Voting and Mail Ballots.




Trends on the National level:

Even though GOP invested in voting early campaign in the past few years, Democrats still hold a slight edge of about 3.3%

Turnout:



Women hold 8.2% advantage over men when it comes to early voting.

Turnout by Voter Frequency:



Trends in the Battleground States:
(Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, North Carolina, Nevada, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin)

Democrats hold an advantage of 4.4% within the battleground states.

Turnout:


Turnout by Voter Frequency:


Arizona:


Georgia:


Michigan:

Michigan does not have partisan voter registration, so the modeled political affiliation is all over the place. Still, it shows clear advantage Democrats.

North Carolina:


Nevada:


Pennsylvania:


Pennsylvania Vote Share by Voter Frequency:


Wisconsin



Considering all this data and comparing it to the trends from 2020 and 2022, I believe this election is a tossup, with the outcome hinging on the final voter demographics and turnout on election day. It's anticipated that Republicans may not enjoy the same election day advantage they had in 2020, given their increased focus on early voting this time. Nevertheless, it's likely that the winner won't be clear on election night, again.

With that said, right now I believe that Harris has a slight edge within the the blue wall which gives her the advantage and better chances of victory. I state this based on the early vote share and voter frequency data in Pennsylvania.

This is a great example of Chesterton's fence.

I wonder how many long inactive players have actually died

Напишано од Metyu, 25.10.2024 at 14:52

Напишано од temp, 25.10.2024 at 14:52

Hi, why don't we do some scenario cws? Enigma has 3-5 people that can cw on scenarios. We can do ostfront if any clan wants or ww1 or any other scenario that is played a lot.

Scenarios are not balanced.

Delete this before dire sees it.

P.S 2v2 and 3v3 are not balanced either.

Напишано од Prussia., 24.10.2024 at 19:53

This guide has changed my life, what would I do without it?

Yeah sure

Напишано од temp, 25.10.2024 at 14:54

Напишано од Metyu, 25.10.2024 at 14:52

Scenarios are not balanced.

Then why play them in the first place?

Напишано од Metyu, 25.10.2024 at 14:52

Scenarios are not balanced.

Then why play them in the first place?

Напишано од temp, 25.10.2024 at 14:52

Hi, why don't we do some scenario cws? Enigma has 3-5 people that can cw on scenarios. We can do ostfront if any clan wants or ww1 or any other scenario that is played a lot.

Scenarios are not balanced.

Hi, why don't we do some scenario cws? Enigma has 3-5 people that can cw on scenarios. We can do ostfront if any clan wants or ww1 or any other scenario that is played a lot.

Напишано од temp, 24.10.2024 at 19:49

Напишано од Witch-Doctor, 29.12.2020 at 15:29

Why can't people just cw and skip all the stupid politics. Why are almost every clan this season dodging cws against us.

Напишано од temp, 29.12.2020 at 18:10

Because you don't have Tempest to lure clans for cw.

I miss this era, everyone dodging Enigma and Tempest now

There are only a few rules we still follow from the days of our glorious shqiptar ruler, and the most important one is: no CW against WD.

Zayn is better anyway

Cyberbullying ? they said they found drugs in his system and the room he was staying at , he was probably drugged out of his mind and thought he was spider man.
Why are people idolizing celebrities ? half of them are on drugs and the other half cant point out their country on a map if u asked them

Real

This guide has changed my life, what would I do without it?

Напишано од Witch-Doctor, 29.12.2020 at 15:29

Why can't people just cw and skip all the stupid politics. Why are almost every clan this season dodging cws against us.

Напишано од temp, 29.12.2020 at 18:10

Because you don't have Tempest to lure clans for cw.

I miss this era, everyone dodging Enigma and Tempest now

Напишано од The Panda Jew, 07.04.2023 at 04:16

I miss Temp

I miss you too
Also lion too (I got him banned)

Dopey

Напишано од DeepFriedUnicorn, 23.10.2024 at 13:40

North Korea is fake Korea
Russian federation is fake Russia

i'm pretty sure north korea and the Russian Federation exist but ok

28

North Korea is fake Korea
Russian federation is fake Russia

Напишано од PalmaDeMallorca, 22.10.2024 at 18:45

"inspired by Tengri" bro is twearking for support on his vid lmaoooo

ky5

Long ass block of text ahead, beware

AI is necessary in every strategy game at this point. Atwar is no exception.
I won't get into marketing because I have no idea on how the game is being advertised on an internal level. I also won't talk about trolls since that's just a laughable option, trolls exist everywhere, even irl, you gotta learn to deal with that. AI would also somewhat solve the power creep between veterans and newbies, therefore, there's a beginner lobby already, with tons of forum guides and youtube videos on advanced aw content, so the "hard to adapt" vote option is debatable in my opinion as well.

There is a small issue with that however. I don't believe the amount of effort that goes into developing such a system would provide as much benefit. In other words, it's a great idea, although it wouldn't have a significant impact on the retention, most likely. It may improve the situation for a year or two, or even reverse the stagnation, but you would expect a much greater result for such a huge investment of time and energy (coding an AI feature, even if it's very simplistic and "low elo").

As a proof of concept, imagine the following 2 scenarios...

You are a brand new player who just found the game and you successfully finished the tutorial, played 1 or 2 games against players, and you have reached rank 2. This is already a small portion of the people, by the way. Now you want to enter a game with players and enjoy the game, try to improve, whatever... Here's where the huge difference kicks in.

In scenario A) you see 3 games in the beginner lobby. One of them is a random scenario with a weird thumbnail, a europe preset with 1/10 players, and a world 50k game with 4/20 players. You join the world 50k game. It is turn 3, somebody has already taken the entirety of China and the eastern parts of Asia, there is basically a self-made European Union, and the last two players are fighting in north america. One of the america players is allied to the Eu player, and the Eu player is sending troops over to help. In this situation, you decide to join in the middle east and ally the asia player. He refuses to ally you and the europe player quits. Then you see the winning america player allying the asia player, so now it is 2v1 against you, and you have barely taken the middle east with your limited knowledge of the game. They are also higher rank than you or alts of high ranked players. You either abandon/surrender and try to join another game, or host one yourself, or you try to play with these impossible odds and basically not enjoy the game.

In scenario B) there's 15 games in the beginner lobby, with most of them having 2-3 players, and at least 10 bots. There's a 50k funds world game with 7 players and 20 bots so that is 27/40. You join this game. Then you see that South America has 2 bots only and no players. The bots are set to easy mode in the match settings, so they are not that difficult to kill. You manage to kill the Brazil : Southeast bot while playing argentina, and you have the Colombia bot expanding in the north. You ally the america player and you defeat the Colombia bot together. Now the rest of the world is in chaos with the bots fighting each other and the players, while the players also go at each other. After this long 3 hours game, you are satisfied with the 1.5k SP you earned, and the 'friend' you made (america player).

Which one sounds more enjoyable, more engaging? Obviously scen B, for the vast majority of people at least.

So while there have been solutions in the past that improve the game in different ways to keep the players engaged and show signs of the game being alive, it would not be worthwhile to work on currently (and Dave pointed this out in this very topic earlier). One idea that comes to my mind is the suggestion of making different kinds of no-go zones. There's currently a no-go zone option for mapmakers and it also exists on the default world map, where you basically cannot move troops into (or through, unless they are aerial units). The suggestion itself in the form of an example; you wanna move infantry from Tunisia to Nigeria, in a straight line. You get a movement range nerf of -3 on your infs, since that entire area of the planet is an uninhabited desert (Sahara). It just makes sense to simulate attrition there in some way or at least limit the movement of the troops. In terms of coding this, it is not that difficult either, just copy paste the no-go zone functions for the most part, then the only tricky thing will be to calculate the movement range of the troops which are outside of the zone and moving in, or inside and moving out, but not completely in it.

At the end of the day, there's at least a few dozen ideas like that, but I think AI - by far - would be the most impactful, without actually changing or altering anything in the base game, as you could just disable or enable bots to your liking, and it is an idea that can be expanded upon.

Edit:
Oh boy... I did not even mention the fact that if a player leaves, he can be replaced by an AI. Which could also be a setting you can toggle (whether you want a leaving palyer to be replaced or become neutral).