Нови објави

اوه ان العربي وسوف احتلكم ايها الحمق هههههه

Напишано од Patricky, 28.07.2025 at 05:12

Напишано од Dave, 26.07.2025 at 15:21

Also I have not given up on atWar, despite what the angry Hungarian man says.

The angry Hungarian man is simply stating facts.

...

Calling me an angry hungarian man and not outright banning me is already a more respectful treatment than I expected when I created this account, so I guess 'thank you' (?) for that.
By the way, you weren't supposed to do investigations about me, I would've told you who I am, I even used my real name as the account name this time around for transparency, although it wasn't a huge effort to figure me out I assume.
...

(Give a small IoT device with raspberry pi to Sascha, which goes off in a loud alarm whenever he's driving or at work, to give him a heart attack as someone somewhere randomly creates an alt. If he survives it, he can log in and punish them. He would enjoy that I think, especially if the suspect is bugs.)

...

Let's have a deal. I'll admit you haven't given up on the game if you admit that you haven't released a single meaningful update to the game for 3.5 years ('you' refers to the atWar staff/employees/etc. not You personally)
...

Interesting deal... I don't mean to derail this, but suggesting Dave give Sascha a raspberry pi is pure genius.
Make Atwar Great Again!

Напишано од Estus, 26.07.2025 at 13:38

Terrible idea.

You made bad maps, i can fix it

Напишано од Kaska, 19.07.2025 at 11:59

It's up to the mods to grant them on request

Why is this rat a moderator again?

Напишано од Lord Aragorn, 27.07.2025 at 14:00

feel like it should at least be viable for the WG, with funding, to be able to rush France early.

Nobody on Central Powers will be able to fund West Germany. That also wouldn't be historically correct.

Напишано од Lord Aragorn, 27.07.2025 at 14:00

Right now, even if Wg takes France, it doesnt seem that taking France is decisive enough since UK is still quite seemingly impregnable

UK would be extremely vulnerable once France falls.

Напишано од Lord Aragorn, 27.07.2025 at 14:00

This means that every time the only way for CP to win is if Prussia beats Russia.

It's not the only way, but CP indeed must take Russia out of the equation indeed.

Напишано од Lord Aragorn, 27.07.2025 at 14:00

So what if Wg is able to produce some kind of expensive elite attack unit on the first 4 turns only so that Wg could have a serious possibility of smashing through the trenches

I dont think any WG player would risk that. And WG already has elite attack units after t14.

Напишано од Lord Aragorn, 27.07.2025 at 14:00

WG could produce some kind of elite naval unit in France only to really give UK a hard time.

Thats not historically accurate. Germany never gave UK a hard time, rather than uboats.

But thanks a lot for your insights, Aragorn.

Improving balance. You need to fix West Germany's income in that map. It becomes impossible to make troops past a certain turn, even with the imperialist strategy. Now, imagine with other stats, such as PD. I am well aware this is not the best of the recommendations, but it is a simple one to give more balance to the map. I think that 500 to 1000 more per turn will give this balance. You could also check the incomes of the basic WW1 for comparison: In original WW1, WG would make even more than the UK, and UK would be richer than France. In your map, France is richer than UK, and also richer than West Germany.

Напишано од Dave, 26.07.2025 at 15:21

Also I have not given up on atWar, despite what the angry Hungarian man says.

The angry Hungarian man is simply stating facts.

I would personally like to believe that you haven't abandoned the game on a fundamental level, but this is the common belief among players, while the game hasn't received a (recorded) meaningful update - not even a minor bugfix - for 3 years and 6 months precisely. At the end of the day, on a multiplayer game with live service, this is what matters. I said I don't blame you because the interest for a game after release usually keep decreasing, so what... you put days, weeks, months of work in, to get 3 people to keep playing longer? I understand it.

I haven't been to this game for nearly 4 years, didn't even talk to other atwar players, I just cut contacts. Now that I returned I see 2 new strategies in the game and that's it. This is an objective fact.

Calling me an angry hungarian man and not outright banning me is already a more respectful treatment than I expected when I created this account, so I guess 'thank you' (?) for that.
By the way, you weren't supposed to do investigations about me, I would've told you who I am, I even used my real name as the account name this time around for transparency, although it wasn't a huge effort to figure me out I assume.

Напишано од Dave, 26.07.2025 at 15:21

I appreciate your suggestions. I think the bigger problem is we have so many high-rank players using low-rank alts and going into the beginners lobby where they shouldn't be. I think we need to crack down on alt accounts... either block people from creating alts, ban them, or at the very least flag them so everyone can see which accounts are alts and who they belong to. Maybe we even combine the ranks to show a users "true rank"? I haven't fully decided yet but this is something I've been thinking about for a long time.

I doubt you've read my post this far but if you did, I'd like to add my two cents to the main topic here, similarly to when couple of months ago you agreed with me on the topic of adding bots to the game...

You should put a limitation on guest accounts in my opinion, such as they cannot join the main lobby for 3 days after creation (the date after which they get automatically deleted I believe), thus forcing them to register new accounts. This has its own pros and cons and I'm pretty sure you've considered it already. It would be a little harder to track alts, but at the same time heavily disincentivize and discourage the use of alts, when it comes to using multiple accounts within the same game.

Regarding the idea of either banning the alts of higher rank players, or merging their ranks to show the 'true rank'; I honestly don't know how you'd approach and tackle this. If it's possible, certainly option 2 (true rank) would be better.

Also, if a player creates a new account or joins as a guest from the same IP (or something like that, I leave it to you) there should be a warning and the main account has to be flagged for checking. The warning is optional, it can scare some people off from a psychological point of view, or you can just keep it hidden. If you get this system to work with a very high accuracy, you can even implement auto-banning that is a little less harsh than actual human moderators with processed evidence.

(Give a small IoT device with raspberry pi to Sascha, which goes off in a loud alarm whenever he's driving or at work, to give him a heart attack as someone somewhere randomly creates an alt. If he survives it, he can log in and punish them. He would enjoy that I think, especially if the suspect is bugs.)


May I ask why we focus on this though instead of developing the game itself? Yeah, on a second thought, forget it... You're the owner, you have different concerns I guess. We're may as well stuck here forever in a time capsule like you told waffel. But then... why bother even responding to suggestions? To keep up the disguise and prove you haven't abandoned the game?

Let's have a deal. I'll admit you haven't given up on the game if you admit that you haven't released a single meaningful update to the game for 3.5 years ('you' refers to the atWar staff/employees/etc. not You personally). I don't know what you're cooking up internally, but this is what we see and experience as players.

I'm not waffel or bugs. What matters to me is results. If there's 1 or 2 new strategies every year (analogy), I'm fine with that too.

I feel like it should at least be viable for the WG, with funding, to be able to rush France early. Right now, even if Wg takes France, it doesnt seem that taking France is decisive enough since UK is still quite seemingly impregnable. This means that every time the only way for CP to win is if Prussia beats Russia. But it would be nice if the CP could win by hard focussing on the Western Front as well.

So what if Wg is able to produce some kind of expensive elite attack unit on the first 4 turns only so that Wg could have a serious possibility of smashing through the trenches. And to make it seemingly worthwhile to do so, perhaps WG could produce some kind of elite naval unit in France only to really give UK a hard time. These elite units would be expensive, thus requiring perhaps even Prussia to help fund Wg.

Напишано од Dave, 26.07.2025 at 15:13

Напишано од JT., 16.07.2025 at 00:54

Just curious if your willing to sell now? i know it's not making any money anymore really..

No, I'm not interested in selling, but thank you.

>let atwar die
>don't sell it

What did he mean by this?

Can you dox terminal so the community can know if he was arrested for REDACTED ?

Ok I'm kinda new to strategys but when I used logistical wizard I found myself heavily relying on other troops rather than militia as they just didn't have the range I needed (I spawned in Africa cause the good spots were taken) and while I understand this is good for stuff that is close together if u ever Need to move those militia without transports your stuck which is why I think insurrection which buffs militia from what I can see should give +1 or +2 movement to militia

Realistically deleting the beginners room is the best option, then just release more tutorials and the players can host their own games, basically 90% of the organized games come from discord so the main issue we need to be worried about imo is just player retention, we need more strat changes and more motivation to play (pc/sp drops). tbh there are actually so many issues in this game idk if it is even worth to list them all out, we just have to fix it slwoly XD

Напишано од AlFatih, 12.07.2025 at 16:35

Hi guys, This Idea have been moving in my head since I started playing this game. Shortly: the Games should be distriputed according to the ranks. I knew that in beginners game the ranks is from 1-6, but what after if you are rank 7 you have to play with people with rank 1000. someone would say you can categorize this in game settings, here you should have priemum. I think this should be more organised than this but it is a simple solution and this shouldn't be just for priemum players because this is the core of the game. what excite me when I play with someone that his rank is above me 6 times?? btw( I mean with ranks the average of players ability and expierence not talking about people who is bad with higher ranks). All need to get expirence but not with very far differences(even here upgrades play a role).

So what should be done!!
The simple thing is to make level setup for all playes because as I said this is the core of the game.
the bigger improvemnet I suggest is to make rooms for specific ranks like 1-6, 6-9, 10-13, and so on
this is not new, look at other games for example clash or clans, you fight people at your house level or cup scores.
this is my suggestion
All the best.

I appreciate your suggestions. I think the bigger problem is we have so many high-rank players using low-rank alts and going into the beginners lobby where they shouldn't be. I think we need to crack down on alt accounts... either block people from creating alts, ban them, or at the very least flag them so everyone can see which accounts are alts and who they belong to. Maybe we even combine the ranks to show a users "true rank"? I haven't fully decided yet but this is something I've been thinking about for a long time.

Also I have not given up on atWar, despite what the angry Hungarian man says.

Напишано од JT., 16.07.2025 at 00:54

Just curious if your willing to sell now? i know it's not making any money anymore really..

No, I'm not interested in selling, but thank you.

Terrible idea.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHH EVZQE NO REPORT PLEASEEEEE HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Look at this guy saying all this stuff abt how he isnt bad, literally 18 ppl voted no to 11 yes, no one wants u here loser lmfaooooooo

Let me clone it to fix it full: add Spain, Persia and Arabia >:)

The deal is simple: make the best suggestion and win 300 ProtoCoins!

I'm looking for a way to improve The Great War: Paths of Glory, and I need some of you, armed with commendable intelligence, to help me and suggest something that will truly make a difference.

Anything goes! New units, new countries, general economic changes, adding or removing players, etc. When you open the form link below, fill it out and write your suggestion in the last text box. As mentioned, the best suggestion will be announced, and the person who submitted it will receive 300 ProtoCoins.

SUGGESTION FORM

Update #4 - Schlieffen
v1.3.3

Changelog (25/07/25):

Units:

• "Carpathian Entrenchment" added to Bucovina.
  
• +2 attack for Heavy Tank.
  
• +1 attack for Communist Vanguard.
  
• +2 critical hit for Communist Vanguard.
  
• +1 HP for Heavy Tank.
  
• +1 range for Heavy Tank.
  
• +5 cost for Greek Infantry.
  
• +10 cost for Greek Transport.
  
• -40 cost for Zeppelin Bomber.
  
  Finances:
  
• +1500 starting funds for German Empire: West.
  
• +900 starting funds for Austria-Hungary.
  
• +500 starting funds for German Empire: East.
  
• +100 income for German Empire: West.
  
• +25 income for Poland.
  
• -50 income for Russia.
  
• -100 upkeep for Inflation.
  
• +50 upkeep for Portuguese Troops.
  
  Reinforcements:
  
• +2 reinforcements for Ottoman Empire (Trabzon, Damascus).
  
• +2 reinforcements for German Empire: West (Erfurt, Strasbourg).
  
• +1 reinforcements for Russian Empire (Novorossiysk oil field)
  
• -3 reinforcements for Russian Empire (Sicheslav, Krasnodar, Stavropol).
  
  Events:
  
• +10 Armoured Cars for Austria-Hungary in turn 2 (Wien).
  
• +5 Communist Vanguard for German Empire: East in turn 14 (Russia).
  
• +3 units for Ottoman Empire in turn 2 (Sana'a).
  
• +2 units for Ottoman Empire in turn 2 (Edirne).
  
  Names:
  
• Kyiv → Kiyev.
  
• Tallin → Reval.
  
• Zhytomyr → Zhitomir.
  
• Chernihiv → Chernigov.
  
• Kharkiv → Kharkov.
  
• Sicheslav → Ekaterinoslav.
  
• Krasnodar (city) → Ekaterinodaro.
  
• Krasnodar (country) → Kuban.
  
• Kishinev → Kishinyov.
  
• Odesa → Odessa.
  
• Balta Tiraspol → Podolskaya
  
• Thuringia → Sachsen.

If he gets unbaned , I want everybody unbaned , simple as that

Tengo una duda, que funcion cumple los generales y los hombres con banderas en el mapa de Napoleon, que ayuda ofrece o que bonos otorgan?

Напишано од PerfectBalance, 23.07.2025 at 13:10

You used alts on two different sides (teams) of a scenario, multiple times. I won't bother explaining anything further, it becomes clearer and clearer that you're a lost cause, from many standpoints.

Which game?

You used alts on two different sides (teams) of a scenario, multiple times. I won't bother explaining anything further, it becomes clearer and clearer that you're a lost cause, from many standpoints.

Напишано од PerfectBalance, 23.07.2025 at 13:04

Here's a tip: Learn to live with the consequences of your actions.

Said actions, ruined other players' atWar experience. Why bother playing a game where there is a player who has alts on both sides of a scenario, who uses alts to exploit and troll ?

People spend time and energy to play this game and both these things are important for an average productive adult who might want to spend a few hours in this game to relax and enjoy himself. With you in the game, it is pre-determined that these hours and energy will be wasted, never to be returned, because you decided you want to play with people and their intellect.

You did not simply ruin the game experience. You literally wasted hours and hours of precious time for each and every player you exploited, and for this you deserve every single day of ban in the world.

You mention that atwar's playerbase is rapidly declining. True, but here's two things to consider: 1) You're a part of the problem, whether you realise it or not, you're forcing players out with your actions. 2) It is better to have a few honest players and play a decent game every fortnight, rather than play everyday, and get to have trolls and exploiters in the game. The solution to the playerbase problem is DEFINETLY not unbanning people who ruin the game itself.

Perhaps instead of urging everybody to reconsider their position and stance towards you, maybe, just maybe, it is time for you to reconsider your life decisions, that have made you 1) So clingy to a game that you cant live without playing it for 3 months, 2) So needy to cheat and exploit in a game, ruining the experience of other players, and draining you of any feeling of satisfaction of victory, as any you might achieve, has been done so through foul ways.

I would like to know how am I wasting the time of other players? By using 2 accounts in the same team in a scenario game I make the game fill faster so there is a smaller risk of the game not filling. I am not exploiting (mods can confirm that) so I don't understand why that was brought up in this discussion. Sometimes we need to wait 30 minutes for one person to join so the games fill, but there are also a lot of situations when games fail simply because we are missing just one player. Using an ALT to help fill games (on the same team) should be allowed in my opinion.

Here's a tip: Learn to live with the consequences of your actions.

Said actions, ruined other players' atWar experience. Why bother playing a game where there is a player who has alts on both sides of a scenario, who uses alts to exploit and troll ?

People spend time and energy to play this game and both these things are important for an average productive adult who might want to spend a few hours in this game to relax and enjoy himself. With you in the game, it is pre-determined that these hours and energy will be wasted, never to be returned, because you decided you want to play with people and their intellect.

You did not simply ruin the game experience. You literally wasted hours and hours of precious time for each and every player you exploited, and for this you deserve every single day of ban in the world.

You mention that atwar's playerbase is rapidly declining. True, but here's two things to consider: 1) You're a part of the problem, whether you realise it or not, you're forcing players out with your actions. 2) It is better to have a few honest players and play a decent game every fortnight, rather than play everyday, and get to have trolls and exploiters in the game. The solution to the playerbase problem is DEFINETELY not unbanning people who ruin the game itself.

Perhaps instead of urging everybody to reconsider their position and stance towards you, maybe, just maybe, it is time for you to reconsider your life decisions, that have made you 1) So clingy to a game that you cant live without playing it for 3 months, 2) So needy to cheat and exploit in a game, ruining the experience of other players, and draining you of any feeling of satisfaction of victory, as any you might achieve, has been done so through foul ways.

Напишано од Frieren, 23.07.2025 at 12:47

Just context for everyone, Evzqe has been fully aware of rules for a long time, he has used IE to hack multiple games, he joins with multiple accounst without people's permission, he does this in world map too, he logs into other people acc who he gets passwords from and changes their names,trolls, he deserves his perma ban

May you give an example of how I used IE to hack games?

Just context for everyone, Evzqe has been fully aware of rules for a long time, he has used IE to hack multiple games, he joins with multiple accounst without people's permission, he does this in world map too, he logs into other people acc who he gets passwords from and changes their names,trolls, he deserves his perma ban

It's remarkable how far this situation has escalated, and I believe much of the responsibility lies with @evqze himself, who kept stirring the pot instead of trying to resolve things early on. Everything I know about the ban came from his own prosecutors and from @evqze himself. Still, something about the permanent ban doesn't sit right with me.

As far as I understand, @evqze had an alt account that he occasionally used to fill empty slots in games struggling to start. Anyone who's played atWar in recent months knows how difficult it can be to gather enough players, it can take hours (sometimes many hours). In that context, using an alt to fill one last spot becomes a tempting idea, even if it breaks the rules.

The entire system designed to prevent the use of alt accounts exists to stop players from farming SP/Elo, sabotaging games, ruining competitive, or harassing others. Given that, it's hard to imagine someone using an alt simply to play without ulterior motives. And yet, that's exactly what @evqze believed he could do, driven by the desire to enjoy the game in a time of scarce players. Unfortunately, that poor judgment resulted in a permanent ban. What bothers me most is that the majority of those who began attacking and accusing @evqze in recent weeks aren't even active in atWar compared to him. He played nearly every day. They don't face the same desolate lobbies, and thus, can't understand his motivation. They attributed malice to what was simply naivety.

It's also worth noting that @evqze did not took the ban well. He kept trying to play using other accounts, which I consider his biggest mistake. Instead of seeking dialogue, he just kept trying to play, something that for him was always the primary goal. In his eyes, he couldn't understand being punished for simply wanting to play, since he had never sabotaged, disrupted, or trolled anyone. His error lay in how he went about it (what I see as a desperate attempt to play).

After enduring a wave of hostility on Discord and atWar lobby, @evqze likely began provoking his accusers (a second mistake that only worsened the situation and made him look more like the villain) by tricking them to think he was still playing using alt accounts (which in most of times he wasnt). I repeatedly told him to stop provoking, even while understanding his frustration. And honestly, I believe he has stopped, whether because he listened or came to that decision on his own.

Here's what we can conclude:

• @evqze wanted to play atWar
  
• Other players (mostly inactive) didn't like it
  
• He misunderstood the rules
  
• He got permanently banned
  
• He didn't take the ban well
  
• atWar lost a daily active player who never intended harm
  
• The ban had no connection to the real alt abuse problem
  
• atWar remains deserted, with games rarely filling up

My final thought is simple: @evqze should be forgiven, and hopefully, he has learned from his mistakes after all this turmoil.

I think evqze is the only one in the whole game community that deserves to banned even more than xbugs.

Keep evqze banned + ip ban

Now the numbers of players matter ?? , maybe somebody shouldnt have banned half of the player base for retarded reasons